Legal Opinion

Senco Products, Inc. v. Riley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1982No. 1-281A55PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

Defendants Senco and Hahn, manufacturer and distributor of Senco staple guns, appeal from a jury verdict awarding plaintiff $65,000 in damages upon a products liability claim for injuries sustained by plaintiff Jeff Riley when he was hit in the eye by a staple. Defendants argue that the trial court erred by:

1. Admitting plaintiff’s expert witness’s testimony without sufficient factual foundation;

2. Excluding testimony from a defense witness on the issue of warnings given in certain brochures;

3. Restricting cross-examination of the plaintiff concerning two prior inconsistent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Elder v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Cornette v. Searjeant Metal Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Shirley J. Lindsay, of the Estate of John Douglas Lindsay, Deceased v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Welch v. Railroad Crossing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. GreggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Nehi Beverage Co., Inc. v. PetriIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. EdgmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Larrance v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API