Legal Opinion

People v. Lucas

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1924No. Crim. No. 742PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEYAND, J., pro tem.

Appellant having been prosecuted and convicted in the superior court of Sacramento County upon an information charging him with the crime of forgery, presents to this court his claims that there was error in the trial court on the part of the prosecution and in the following particulars, to wit: First, that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, and, secondly, that the court erred in permitting the introduction of evidence of other crimes.

1. The information upon which the defendant was tried charged the defendant with the crime of forgery, in language as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GayleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. DavidianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. CarmonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API