Legal Opinion

People v. Carmona

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1926No. Docket No. 1356PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, P. J., pro tem.

Defendant was tried and convicted upon an information filed by the district attorney of Alameda County, charging a violation of section 476 of the Penal Code.

From the judgment following the verdict of guilty, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, the defendant has appealed.

The information is in the language of the statute, and the charging part thereof is as follows:

"Frank S. Carmona, Jr., alias Leo T. Levin, is accused by the District Attorney of the County of Alameda by this information of the crime of felony, to-wit, a violation of Section 476 of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. PeralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. People v. ThalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. EarlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. MenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. In Re LameyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. GutkowskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. LarueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API