Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Drain

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1963No. 3201PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

This was a suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. A finding and judgment were entered for plaintiffs and this appeal followed. Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to show (1) a causal connection between the injury and the necessity for the repairs made, and (2) the reasonableness of the cost of the repairs.

In this jurisdiction the governing principles are well settled. Where damages to an automobile are such that they may be repaired reasonably, restoring the vehicle to substantially its condition prior to the injury, the measure of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Hemminger v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Brooks v. Capital Fleets, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Cade v. Great American Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. V. Chicago Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. V. Chicago Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Consumers United Insurance v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. American Service Center Associates v. HeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Eureka Investment Corp., N.V. v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API