Legal Opinion
Cade v. Great American Insurance Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 1958No. 2146PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant’s car collided with one driven by Charles Menges, whom appellee had insured under a “$100 deductible” policy. According to the complaint Mr. Menges sustained damages to his car which required repairs costing $338.22. Under the terms of the policy appellee paid him $238.22. It then brought this suit as sub-rogee against appellant for that sum, and was awarded judgment. The sole contention urged on this appeal is that appellee’s proof on the question of damages was incompetent because (1) it was not properly authenticated, and (2) it did not satisfy the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Wright v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Probst v. Trustees of the Board of Domestic Missions of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hemminger v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brewer v. DrainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Levine v. J. Mahler's Pilgrim House Furniture, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. HolmesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983