Legal Opinion

Roger B. Ennenga v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 4, 2012No. 10–1911PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZAGER, Justice.

In this case, we must interpret a rule of criminal procedure which implements the speedy trial guarantees found in both the State and Federal Constitutions. If a defendant does not waive these rights, then Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.33 requires the court dismiss a prosecution if an indictment or trial information is not “found” within forty-five days of the defendant’s arrest, unless the State can show good cause for its failure. The State inexplicably failed to file a trial information within forty-five days, and Ennenga’s counsel did not file a motion to dismiss.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. State v. BearseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. State of Iowa v. Judith Renae UtterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. State v. GorhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Shaunta Rose HopkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Phuoc Nguyen v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. State of Iowa v. Valentin VelezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. State of Iowa v. Deyawna Leanett TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2012

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API