Legal Opinion

State v. Smitherman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 8, 2007No. 05-0692PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

In this ease we must determine if the defendant’s constitutional rights to conflict-free counsel were violated. In addition, we must determine whether there was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of first-degree murder. Finding no constitutional violation or problem pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence, we affirm the defendant’s conviction.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

In 1990 law enforcement officers found Richard Tasler’s skeletal remains buried on Joel Smitherman’s property. As a result, and after a long investigation, the State finally charged…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. LymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State of Iowa v. Lavelle Lonelle McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. State of Iowa v. Robert Lynn VaughanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. Keefe v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. State Public Defender v. Iowa District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API