Legal Opinion

United States v. Prime

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2005No. 02-30375Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 02-30375 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-01-00310-RSL MICHAEL STEFAN PRIME, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 4, 2004—Seattle, Washington Filed April 16, 2004 Amended December 14, 2005 Before: Stephen S. Trott, Richard A. Paez, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Trott 16299 16302 UNITED STATES v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API