Kessler v. Broder
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtTamilia, J.
¶ 1 Appellants appeal the May 18, 2008 Order entering a mandatory, preliminary injunction requiring them to provide appel-lees with one out of every three readings of certain magnetic resonance images (MRI’s).
¶ 2 At issue is a dispute among radiologists who co-own MRI centers. Appellants (the Broder Group) 1 are the majority shareholders of the four defendant corporations. 2 Appellees (the Kessler Group) 3 are the minority shareholders. The Kes-sler Group initiated this action in which they allege, inter alia, an oral agreement pursuant to which the Broder Group promised to allocate MRI reads…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Summit Towne Centre, Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Mazzie v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Valley Forge Historical Society v. Washington Memorial ChapelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Viener v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ambrogi v. ReberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Weissberger v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- York Group, Inc. v. Yorktowne Caskets, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Greenmoor, Inc. v. BURCHICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Warfield v. ShermerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.