Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 1986No. 84 Civ. 8262 CLBPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRIEANT, District Judge.
In this action for damages and injunctive relief brought under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332, plaintiff Paul F. McDonald alleges that the defendant Piedmont Aviation, Inc. violated § 43 of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, 49 U.S.C. § 1552, by refusing to give hiring preference to the plaintiff as the statute purportedly would require. Defendant has moved to dismiss or, alternatively, to stay this action pending resolution of an unrelated ease pending in the District Court of the District of Columbia, discussed below.
Section 43, entitled “Employee…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- LaSala v. Needham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Crocker v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Takata Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Georgetown Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.