Legal Opinion

Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex rel. Arcata & Mad River Railroad

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 10, 1933No. 5873PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

Areata, & Mad River Railroad Company, which we shall call appellee, operated a narrow gauge line from Areata, Cal., where it connected with the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, to Korbel, Cal., a distance of about 13 miles. Its entire capital was owned by Northern Redwood Lumber Company, and it was' built primarily to transport the lumber company’s product for delivery to connecting carriers. Approximately 92 per cent, of its revenues were derived from traffic furnished by the lumber company. The Commission found as a fact that when the timber of the lumber company was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Humboldt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. The Propeller BurlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. United States ex rel. Abilene & S. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  5. United States ex rel. Cripple Creek & Colorado Springs R. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API