Legal Opinion
David A. Altschuler Trust v. Blanchette
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 8, 1994No. 12070PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is an action to recover rent in which, following a trial to the court, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendants raise the following issues: (1) Did the trial court improperly hold that the defendants breached their contractual obligations to the plaintiff? (2) Did the lease provide a covenant to renew or a covenant to extend the lease? (3) Is the doctrine of part performance applicable to the case? (4) What is the effect of the plaintiff’s failure to reply to special defenses? We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City Coal Co. v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Johnson v. Mary Oliver Candy Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Adam v. ConsoliniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Perrotti v. ChiodoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Zuckerman Group v. RaveisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- 669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- A & M Towing & Recovery, Inc. v. GuaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Warner Associates v. LoganConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- David A. Altschuler Trust v. BlanchetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.