Legal Opinion

Haley v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Larimer County Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Kichmond, O.

This was an action of replevin instituted by Haley as plaintiff in the justice’s court, subsequently appealed to the county court of Larimer county, where judgment was rendered against the plaintiff, to reverse which he prosecutes this appeal. The appeal was perfected under the act of 1885.

The undisputed facts are that plaintiff was the owner of two horses, and that on or about November 30,1886, L. H. Breeze, the then county treasurer of Boutt county, seized the horses for an alleged tax due said county, and sold the same at a tax sale, the defendant becoming the purchaser.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tweed v. MetcalfMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Wisner v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. South Boulder Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Community Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haley v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Isis Litigation, L.L.C. v. Svensk FilmindustriColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Haley v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Goldsmith v. McAnallySupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  5. McPhail v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API