Haley v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the County Court of Larimer County. Action of replevin for two horses. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott
This cause was first brought to this court by appeal. See Haley v. Elliott, 16 Colo. 159, where the facts and legal questions involved in the controversy are briefly stated. The appeal to this court being dismissed without prejudice, the cause was again brought here by writ of error. A motion to dismiss the writ was strenuously contested, but was finally denied (ante, p. 199), and the cause now stands for review upon the record as presented.
The evidence presented shows that Haley, plaintiff below, was the original owner of the horses in controversy, and that defendant, Elliott, bought them…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waddingham v. DicksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Chickering v. FaileIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Breeze v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Breeze v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- State v. Eureka Consolidated Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Modular Communities, Inc. v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- 24, Inc. v. Board of Equalization of Arapahoe CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Duggan v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Bachelor Gulch Operating Co. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Rice v. JeromeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.