Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Bristol & Plainville Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The case was tried to the court and the following facts found: The defendant’s trolley tracks, for a considerable distance east and west of the place of the accident, were laid on the southerly side of the Terryville road, a highway between the towns of Bristol and Terryville, and near the tracks on the south was a warehouse. The tracks were graded at this point for the purpose of permitting vehicular traffic to unload material at this warehouse, and for many years trucks had backed across the graded portion of the tracks while loading and unloading at the warehouse. A few minutes prior to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nehring v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Fine v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  3. Bujnak v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Tullock v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Correnti v. CatinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Matey v. Estate of DemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. DePaola v. SeamourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Caplan v. ArndtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Tefft v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API