Legal Opinion

City of Woodburn v. Domogalla

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Oregon Tax Court allowing a peremptory writ of mandamus which directed defendant to extend on the Marion county assessment rolls a levy for street lighting purposes authorized by an ordinance of plaintiff city.

Plaintiff adopted an ordinance referring to the inhabitants of Woodburn a charter amendment authorizing a levy for street lighting purposes. The levy *403was expressed in terms of millage only. The charter amendment was adopted at an election, after which the city council enacted an ordinance levying the amount necessary to cover the city budget…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sanok v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rosboro Lumber Co. v. HeineOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. City of Woodburn v. DomogallaOregon Tax Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API