Legal Opinion

Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. Botto

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1868PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

This was an action of covenant, in the Superior" Court of the city of Chicago, brought by Charles Botto, against The Peoria Marine and Fire Insurance Company, on a policy of insurance, for three thousand dollars, containing, among others, this clause: “ If, during the insurance, any subsequent insurance should be made upon the property hereby insured, or the risk be increased by the erection of buildings, or by the use or occupation of neighboring premises, or otherwise, or if, for any cause, the company shall so elect, it shall he optional with the company to cancel this policy, in which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buchenau v. HorneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. MaguireIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. German Union Fire Insurance v. Fred G. Clarke Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. McKenzieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Mangrum & Otter Inc. v. Law Union & Rock Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API