Taylor v. Karrer
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.
This is an action for malpractice against two medical practitioners. Defendants plead the statute of limitations and this issue was presented in a bifurcated trial. The court found that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.
On appeal plaintiff asserts that the finding of the court is not supported by the evidence and that section 25-222, R. S. Supp., 1974, is unconstitutional. There is very little conflict in the evidence. The record discloses that in the summer of 1967, Dr. R. W. Karrer ascertained that plaintiff had a thyroid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Spath v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Rogers v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Tom & Jerry, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Neeman v. Nebraska Natural Resources CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Anderson v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.