Legal Opinion

Olliff v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 18, 1925No. 15855PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. In an action to. recover damages for injuries to an automobile resulting from a collision, the measure of damages is “the difference between the value of the property before the damage and afterwards” (Douglas v. Prescott, 31 Ga. App. 684 (1) (121 S. E. 689)); but in a case where the owner has undertaken to make proper and necessary repairs, in establishing such damage he may include such proper and necessary expenses, provided such items are the direct and proximate result of the collision and represent the reasonable value of such necessary material and labor, and provided the aggregate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pacetti v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Savannah Electric Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Lamon v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Moon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  5. Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Ware v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Mutual Casualty Insurance v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API