Legal Opinion
State v. Hicks
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1958PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
On 10 January 1957 the defendant Ralph M. Hicks and Paul R. Bailieaux were jointly indicted by the grand jury of Clackamas County for the crime of burglary not in a dwelling. The charging portion of the indictment reads as follows:
“That said Balph Marlyn Hicks and Paul Bow-tan Bailieaux on or about the 10th day of December, A.D., 1956, in the said County of Clackamas and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously break and enter, by then and there cutting a hole in the wall thereof, a certain building, to-wit: Molalla Food Market located on Highway…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Junius S. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.