Legal Opinion
Gee v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 2016No. C077077APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MURRAY, J.
Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Greyhound), appeals from the trial court’s order granting plaintiff Linda Gee’s motion to set aside dismissal pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b). On appeal, Greyhound argues that the trial court erred in granting relief under section 473, subdivision (b), contending that (1) the court lacked jurisdiction to set aside the dismissal under section 473, subdivision (b), because Gee failed to comply with the requirements of section 1008, and (2) Gee failed to provide a sufficient showing to justify relief under section…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Johnson v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. AliceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pagnini v. Union Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hernandez v. FCA US LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- North American Title Co., Inc. v. GugasyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Pagnini v. Union Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Tawansy v. RIF Investments-3, LLC CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.