Legal Opinion

Batt v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident Board

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1942No. 6964PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A statement of the facts of this case, upon which our decision on the merits of the appeal must rest, is set forth in sufficient detail in the opinion of the Chief Justice ("Concurring in part and dissenting in part"); and, for that reason, no further statement of facts will be made in this opinion.

In this case, where no one is questioning the jurisdiction of the court, but, on the contrary, every party to the proceeding is invoking the jurisdiction and urging the court to exercise it, the writer feels, as he did in the case of Hull v. Cartin,61 Idaho 578, at 596, 105 P.2d 196, wherein he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Big Wood Canal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re Contempt Proceedings of BrainardIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hull v. CartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Garrity v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Town of Lincoln v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Mulanix v. FalenIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Employment Security Agency v. Joint Class "A" School District No. 151Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hubble v. PerraultIdaho Supreme Court · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API