Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Mathis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 9, 1993No. 10547PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment in this action for the dissolution of her marriage, claiming that the trial court (1) abused its discretion by improperly distributing various real and personal property owned by the parties, and (2) improperly made the alimony award to the plaintiff a time limited alimony award. Because we agree with the plaintiff’s second claim, we need not address the first claim, and reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.
The following facts are pertinent to this appeal. The parties were married in 1977, and the marriage had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Sunbury v. SunburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Ippolito v. IppolitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Roach v. RoachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Watson v. WatsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Costa v. CostaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Clark v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Cooley v. CooleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Clements v. Clements, No. Fa91 0119707 S (Aug. 5, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.