Legal Opinion
Costa v. Costa
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 4, 2000No. AC 18958PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
In this appeal from a judgment of marital dissolution, the defendant, Humberto Costa, claims that the trial court improperly (1) awarded the plaintiff, Patricia Costa, a share of his lump sum injury settlement, (2) ordered him to pay the plaintiff $5000 as counsel fees, (3) ordered him to assume ownership and all debts of the plaintiffs business, (4) awarded the plaintiff fifteen years of alimony and (5) issued orders regarding the parties’joint residence and liability for the plaintiffs personal bills. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Beede v. BeedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tevolini v. TevoliniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Prial v. PrialConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Azia v. DilasciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Porter v. PorterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.