Legal Opinion

State v. Sparks

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 26, 1995No. 13528PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4).1 On appeal, the *504defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress two out-of-court identifications, (2) failed to instruct the jury on an essential element of the offense of robbery in the first degree, and (3) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury could…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. TweedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. DolphinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. IngramConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. State v. PetersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  5. State v. GlasperConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API