Legal Opinion

Temple v. Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Multnomah: Robert Gr. Morrow, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Harris. Alfred O. Temple and 62 other property owners commenced this suit for the purpose of enjoining the authorities of the City of Portland from levying or collecting assessments to pay for a street improvement.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: Robert Gr. Morrow, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Harris. Alfred O. Temple and 62 other property owners commenced this suit for the purpose of enjoining the authorities of the City of Portland from levying or collecting assessments to pay for a street improvement. On October 14, 1909, 6 of the plaintiffs herein and 12 others filed a petition for the improvement of Lombard Street, from the west line of Westanna Street to the east line of Wabash Avenue, in the City of Portland, by grading the street to the established grade and paving with Hassam pavement “in conformity with…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harris

1. The plaintiffs argue that the acts of the city were void, because the council in advance selected Hassam as the kind of pavement to be laid, thereby eliminat*563ing the possibility of competition. It has already been determined that there can be no objection to specifying a patented pavement, where the patentee offers to all bidders alike the right to make use of the patented article upon reasonable terms: Johns v. City of Pendleton, 66 Or. 182 (133 Pac. 817, 134 Pac. 312, Ann. Cas. 1915B, 454, 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 990); Sherrett v. City of Portland, 75 Or. 449 (147 Pac. 386). Hitherto it has…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matter of Petition of Anthony DugroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Dean v. CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Hobart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  5. Fishburn v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Wagoner v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Sanborn v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Grimes v. City of SeasideOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Smith Tug & Barge Co. v. Columbia-Pacific Towing Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API