Legal Opinion

Special Indemnity Fund v. Maples

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 26, 1998No. 90,172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOPLIN, Judge:

¶ I .Petitioner Special Indemnity Fund (Fund) seeks review of the trial court’s orders refusing to vacate or modify a previous order and certifying a judgment against Fund under 85 O.S. Supp.1994 § 42 for accrued but unpaid benefits due Respondent Leroy D. Maples (Claimant). In this proceeding, Fund asserts the trial court erred (1) in failing to vacate or correct the facially void order under which Claimant asserted sums due and unpaid, that order directing payment by Fund in violation of 85 O.S. Supp.1994 § 172(E), and (2) in certifying a judgment against Fund in violation of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API