Legal Opinion

Howard A. Lambert v. State of Montana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1976No. 76-1037PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the novel question as to whether due process considerations may affect the duration of confinement resulting from a state court’s commitment arising from a finding of civil contempt. The petitioner, Howard A. Lambert, seeks a writ of habeas corpus alleging as unconstitutional his continuing confinement in a county jail as a result of a civil contempt order entered by a Montana state judge. The federal district court found that the petition presented no constitutional questions and denied the writ. We affirm the denial of the writ of habeas, however, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. In Re MichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re the Personal Restraint of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Joseph Braun, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Tscherim Soobzokov v. Cbs, Inc., Quadrangle/new York Times Book Co., Inc., and Howard Blum, Anthony J. DevitoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API