Katz v. . H. H. Manufacturing Company
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the. Appellate Division of the.Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 12, 1905, which reversed an order of Special Term continuing a preliminary injunction to restrain the election of directors of the defendant company.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the. Appellate Division of the.Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 12, 1905, which reversed an order of Special Term continuing a preliminary injunction to restrain the election of directors of the defendant company. The following questions were certified :. , “(1) The by-laws of the defendant'. corporation provide that the directors shall be five in number, and also, provide that£ stockholders by a, vote of ninety per cent of the stock issued and outstanding may at any regular or special meeting, alter or amend’ the…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs. ■ First question certified answered in the affirmative, second in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisoock, JJ.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ripin v. United States Woven Label Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Clark v. WildSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- In re Stylemaster Department Store, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Christal v. PetryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.