Peabody v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentBurr, J.
I dissent on the ground that the clause in article 6 of the lease which provides “ No reduction of the guaranteed annual dividend rental or in the term of years of this lease shall be made without the unanimous consent of the shareholders of record of the Lessor ” is contrary to public policy and void, and on the further ground that the guaranty of the payment of the seven per cent rental dividend “ in accordance with the terms and provisions ” of the lease could not survive a valid revocation or modification of the lease by the parties to the lease, the defendant’s obligation to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Beveridge v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.