Legal Opinion

Clark v. Wild

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 18, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Petition for a writ of quo warranto brought to the Supreme Court for Orleans County, and heard at its May Term, 1911, on the pleadings and testimony taken and filed. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This is a complaint alleging that each of the defendants illegally holds the office of director of the Percival Furniture Company, a corporation, and that the complainant *214and six other persons, whose names are set out, are the legal directors of the corporation. The complaint prays judgment in accordance with these allegations, and prays for the issuance of the writ of quo warranto.

Conformably to law the complaint sets forth the facts which it is claimed warrant the issue of the writ. P. S. 1972.

The complaint being preferred and prosecuted by a private person it is, as the law requires,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Supreme Council American Legion of Honor v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Presbyterian Mutual Assurance Fund v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State Ex Rel. Brumley v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Danforth v. HuntonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gaski v. BasileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Drown v. OderkirkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. Kaplan v. BlockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  4. Mooney v. Farmers Mercantile & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. State Ex Rel. Venner v. Zanleoni, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API