Day v. CIBA Geigy Corp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the district court’s order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for failure of prosecution under I.R.C.P. 41(b). The Days sued for damages to their raspberry crop allegedly due to the application of PRINCEP 80W, a chemical compound manufactured and sold by CIBA Geigy Corporation. The Days applied PRINCEP 80W to their raspberry crop in 1978 and 1979. The Days filed this action in July of 1980, alleging that PRINCEP 80W had damaged their crop. As the case proceeded, there were numerous pre-trial procedures and extensive motion practice involv*1017ing discovery disputes, motions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Idah-Best, Inc. v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Southern Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. AstorquiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Kirkham v. 4.60 Acres of Land in Vicinity of InkomIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Grant v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Everhart v. Washington County Road & Bridge DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Systems Associates, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Gerstner v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Freiberger v. American Triticale, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Management Catalysts v. Turbo West Corpac, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.