Legal Opinion
Thomas Leslie Holcomb v. A.I. Murphy, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1983No. 82-1549PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner Thomas L. Holcomb, a state prisoner, appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner raised eight grounds in his petition. He contended that: (1) the trial court erred in allowing FBI Agent Thomas Zapata to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kevin Winston Osborn v. Duane Shillinger, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary A.G. McClintock the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Willis Leroy v. R.C. Marshall, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- William Junior Hughes v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Cressman v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Sidney Allen Worthen v. Larry R. Meachum, Director Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.