Felder's Collision Parts, Inc. v. All Star Advertising Agency, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge:
It would not be an antitrust opinion without the line that the antitrust laws were designed for “the protection of competition, not competitors.” Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320, 82 S.Ct. 1502, 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). Though often included by rote, the axiom is particularly apt in this case.
The competitors are Felder’s Collision Parts, Inc., a Louisiana dealer of aftermarket auto body parts that are compatible with General Motors vehicles but not manufactured by GM, and All Star, a dealer of GM-manufactured parts. Felder’s filed this antitrust suit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Peter HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Pulse Network v. VisaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Energy Conversion Devices Liquidation Trust v. Trina Solar Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Teladoc, Inc. v. Texas Medical BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Doctors Hospital of Laredo v. Dr. Ricardo CigarroaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.