Legal Opinion

Glass v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 2000No. CR 00-454; CR 00-455; CR 00-457; CR 00-459Published

1Per curiam

Before us are four motions for rule on the AM. submitted by G.B. “Bing” Colvin, III, requesting permission to file belated petitions for review of orders by the Arkansas Court of Appeals denying his motions for attorneys’ fees in the above-captioned matters.

Mr. Colvin is the managing attorney for the Tenth Judicial District Public Defender Office. The motions for attorneys’ fees for which he seeks review were submitted on behalf of his office by attorneys who acted as “briefing assistants” for the public defender’s office. The briefing assistants, according to Mr. Colvin, are private…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rushing v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Tabor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Magness v. Commerce Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Dugal Logging, Inc. v. Arkansas Pulpwood Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API