Legal Opinion

United States v. Skonberg

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 21, 1958No. 12,015PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was tried and convicted by general court-martial on specifications alleging larceny, forgery, and fraud against the Government, in violation of Articles 121, 123 and 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921, 923 and 932, respectively. The accused entered a plea of not guilty to each specification and Charge. He petitioned this Court alleging that the law officer committed prejudicial error in instructing the court-martial as follows:

“You may find the accused guilty of any offense which you believe beyond a reasonable doubt from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. NoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. McCluskeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. SandersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. LombardiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. BurseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. HollowayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. TrumanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API