Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanders

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 1, 1964No. 17,314PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

The accused was found guilty by general court-martial of assault with intent to commit rape, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for one year, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority affirmed only findings of indecent assault but approved the sentence. An Army board of review affirmed the reduced findings and sentence.

We granted accused’s petition to consider an allegation of error by the law officer in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Deserant v. Cerillos Coal RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. United States v. McIntoshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. LyonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. SkonbergUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. EppsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. Torres-DiazUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. United States v. BrauchlerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  4. United States v. BurseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API