Legal Opinion
H. W. Martens and Robert A. Maurin, Jr. v. Carl F. Barrett, B. C. Farcell and the Texas Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1957No. 16450PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
Because, to the District Court, it was uncontradicted that the operation of the service station was wholly that of the incorporated company M & M Corporation, and not that of its sole stockholders who sued as individual plaintiffs, the complaint for treble damages under the Anti-trust Acts jointly against The Texas Company, the Lessor-Seller and its local consignment distributor, was dismissed on summary judgment since the plaintiffs were not injured in their business or property whatever damage might the corporation have sustained.
We agree. And so doing, this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Bruce Construction Corporation v. United States of America for Use of Westinghouse Electric Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Stein v. United Artists Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Nauslar v. Coors Brewing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Lucille Jeffrey, on Their Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Southwestern BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- American Key Corporation, and Ron Deweese v. Cole National Corporation, and Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.