Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Public Service Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 10, 2006No. 04-AA-1177PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
The issue raised by the present petition for review is whether the District of Columbia Government is entitled to a refund or other retroactive relief from the tariff rate for emergency telephone services that Verizon Washington, DC Inc. (“Verizon”) charged it from 2002 to 2004. Two years after Verizon began to charge the tariff rate pursuant to final authorization from the District of Columbia Public Service Commission (“PSC”), the PSC agreed in a new proceeding initiated by the District Government that the rate was unreasonable and needed to be reduced. However,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Towns of Concord, Norwood, and Wellesley, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Worldcom, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Office of The People's Counsel v. Public Service Comm'n / Exelon Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Office of People's Counsel v. D.C. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.