Legal Opinion

DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO.1:20-CV-3446

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 31, 2022No. 3:20-cv-03446Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SALIL SHARMA, individually and on behalf of SAGE GROUP CONSULTING, INC., Civil Action No. 20-3446 (MAS) (DEA) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION Vv. VIJAY GUPTA et al., Defendants. SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on separate motions to dismiss Plaintiff Salil Sharma’s (“Sharma”) Amended Complaint. The first is from Defendant ProSoft Technology Group, Inc. (“ProSoft”) to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 8.) The second is from Defendants Vijay Gupta (“Vijay”), Rajeev Gupta (“Rajeev”), Jyoti…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API