Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Roth
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1942No. 29191PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The demurrer to the petition raises the question of relator’s qualifications to continue in office and calls for the interpretation and application of Section 4207, General Code, the pertinent portion of which is as follows:
“Each member of council shall be an elector of the-city, shall not hold any other public office or employment, except that of notary public or member of the state militia, and shall not be interested in any contract, with the city. A member who ceases to possess any of the qualifications herein required, or removes from his ward, if elected from a ward, or from the city,…
2Cited by18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Jones v. FarrarOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Wimberly v. DeaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- McKenna v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- People Ex Rel. Happell v. SischoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. WysongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.