Legal Opinion

State v. Lane

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 2007No. 04-1147PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

In this appeal we must primarily decide if evidence obtained from a consent search at one location that followed an illegal search and seizure at another location must be suppressed. The district court denied the motion to suppress. On our review, we conclude the district court properly admitted the evidence at trial. ■We also conclude trial counsel was not ineffective in representing the defendant. We affirm the judgment and sentence of the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

James Lane was arrested on February 11, 2004 and charged with two counts of possession…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State of Iowa v. Robert Dale Lowe, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Hannan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. State Of Iowa Vs. Joshua Daniel FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API