Legal Opinion
United States v. Hitchcock
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2002No. 00-10251PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Amended Opinion United States v. Hitchcock, 286 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir.2002), filed March 21, 2002, is amended as follows:
At 286 F.3d at 1073, amend the last two sentences in the paragraph before the "Conclusion" to read:
"Hitchcock's argument is foreclosed by Harris v. United States, - U.S. 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), and our prior precedent. It is now clear that mandatory minimums do not implicate Apprendi. Id."
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Mark Steven HitchcockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Labrada-BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael DreyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Anthony Toliver, AKA T, United States of America v. Anthony Brian Patterson, AKA Brian Patterson, AKA Little AntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State v. GonsalvesHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. HurdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.