Gilmore v. City of Mankato
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
On the motion of the city of Mankato, one of the defendants, the court ordered the pleadings and proceedings amended so as to make the city a party plaintiff in place of a party defendant. The Northern States Power Company appeals from the order denying its motion to vacate said order transposing the city of Mankato from a defendant to a plaintiff.
Appellant is met by two objections, via., (a) that the order is non-appealable, and (b) that in any event the order making the transposition cannot now be disturbed because it was allowed to become a finality, 30 days having run since…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Attorney General v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Seeling, Jr. v. Deposit Bank Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Copeland v. Dixie Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- United States Roofing & Paint Co. v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.