Legal Opinion

Faircrest Site Opposition Committee v. Levi

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 2, 1976No. Civ. A. C 76-217APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONTIE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, The Faircrest Site Opposition Committee, is an unincorporated association of property owners and/or residents of the residential area adjacent to the proposed location of a juvenile attention center (hereinafter Center) under construction near Faircrest Avenue in Canton Township, Stark County, Ohio. The purpose of the association is to prevent the construction of said Center and, to that end, this action was initiated. In view of the urgency to all parties of the issues presented, this Court has made every practicable effort to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. William T. Miracle v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Belville Mining Company, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Belville Min. Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  4. Belville Mining Company, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API