Legal Opinion

In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 5, 1998No. 97-5228, 97-5229PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition FOR ReheaRing

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

The government’s petition for rehearing raises one point that calls for a response. We held that the government’s deliberative process privilege does not apply when a cause of action is directed at the government’s intent. We explained that the privilege had developed in and applies to circumstances where the government decision-making process is “collateral” to a plaintiffs claim. The government suggests that the term “collateral” is imprecise and that the deliberative process privilege has been employed in circumstances where the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  2. Oceana, Inc. v. Wilbur RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Ridenour v. Kaiser-Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  5. Blue Ocean Institute v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API