People v. Crouse
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid
¶1 The state’s medical marijuana amendment, article XVIII, section 14(2)(e) of the Colorado Constitution, requires law enforcement officers to return medical marijuana seized from an individual later acquitted of a state drag charge. The federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”) prohibits the distribution of marijuana, with limited exceptions. 21 U.S.C. §§ 801-971 (2012). The question in this case is whether the return provision of section 14(2)(e) is preempted by the federal CSA. In a split decision, the court of appeals held that the return provision was not preempted by the CSA on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Santiago-MendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- People v. SchuettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Gaetan H. Bourgoin v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Carson v. ReinerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.