Legal Opinion
IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 23, 2020PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OSCN Found Document:IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423
IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423
2020 OK 57
Case Number: 118582
Decided: 06/23/2020
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2020 OK 57, __ P.3d __
NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423
PAUL TAY, Petitioner,
v.
RYAN KIESEL and MICHELLE TILLEY, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TO DETERMINE THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF STATE QUESTION NO. 807, INITIATIVE…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent · Kane; Dissent · Rowe.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richard William McDaniel v. Rural King Holdings, LLP d/b/a Rural King and RK Administrative Services d/b/a Rural KingDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026