Legal Opinion

US Bank, NA v. Eckert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 9, 2014No. FE111267; A150030PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this forcible entry and wrongful detainer (FED) action against defendant for possession of residential real property. Plaintiff asserted that it was entitled to possession because it had purchased the property following a trust deed foreclosure sale. The trial court entered a general judgment issuing a notice of restitution and writ of execution in favor of plaintiff.

Defendant appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in entering the judgment because plaintiff failed to prove that it was the “purchaser” of the property at the trustee’s sale. Former ORS 86.755(5)(a)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brandrup v. Recontrust Co., N.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Option One Mortgage Corp. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Us Bank, NA v. EckertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API