Legal Opinion

Us Bank, NA v. Eckert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 2014No. FE111267; A150030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

Plaintiff-respondent US Bank, NA, petitions for reconsideration in US Bank, NA v. Eckert, 264 Or App 189, 331 P3d 1064 (2014). As explained below, we allow the petition, reject plaintiffs argument for modification raised for the first time in its petition, and adhere to our opinion in Eckert.

In Eckert, a forcible entry and wrongful detainer (FED) case, we reversed the trial court’s judgment awarding plaintiff possession of certain real property. 264 Or App at 195. We did so based on our conclusion that plaintiff had failed to present sufficient evidence that it was, as it claimed, entitled to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Mikityuk v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  3. NW Property Wholesalers, LLC v. SpitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Option One Mortgage Corp. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Rogers v. RGIS, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lafond v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API